This is a very interesting article that I found online about Texas. There are so many issues to this day about abortions and also many debates about it that seem to never have an end. In this article, it says that a federal judge won’t attempt to block a law that requires women to have a sonogram before having an abortion. However, a district judge (Sam Sparks) finds it wrong and wanted to sway the law towards a different direction because he found it unconstitutional. I believe Sparks is right because it invades people’s privacy. Though there are so many ways to think how it being wrong, I could also see there being ways that it could be right. Like I said before, this topic is so controversial. It’s definitely worth a read. Even though Mr. Sparks tried to change it up, federal appeals court had overturned his decision and has been said that the law needs to be put in place. However, this article doesn’t have an end to it yet because it is still said that the Center for Reproductive Rights will continue to “pursue appeals” towards sonograms prior to abortion.
No comments:
Post a Comment